Channel: Home | About

While sitting in the audio booth waiting to cut the 6pm tease, Bob Schieffer, CBS' new man in the "Big Chair," teased his own show with a reference to President Bush's trip to Argentina for the Summit of the America's. Primarily the protestors, whom Schieffer characterized as "Leftist Inspired." The pictured crowd was very large, carrying placards, posters, signs and banners. Wearing flags, t-shirts and banners decidedly Anti-Bush. Some of these protestors fired slingshots, tossed Molotov cocktails and burned American flags, all in demonstration of the United States, and her President.

Bob Schieffer actually called these protestor's "Leftist Inspired!" That would never happen here in the states. Here they would be "Members of the Growing Anti-War Movement." Here they would be "Opponents of the President and his policies," using slurs like "Liar," "Idiot," and "Dangerously Hitler-esque." But they would never be called Leftists, and certainly not Liberal. That the protestors would be overwhelmingly Democrat, no mention would be made. In the eyes of the media, there is no Extreme Left Wing in the Democratic Party. Only Republicans are labeled "Extreme."

Does anyone see the Hypocrisy? When foreigners do it, they're Leftist, when they're Americans their Anti-War. Schieffer does make reference to Hugo Chavez's socialist leanings and his popularity among the crowd reflected in the banners and flags. But look at the face on some of these flags... Ernesto "Che" Guevara, Marxist Revolutionary... And murderer.

Good Grief! Are these folks serious? They worship a Marxist butcher while vilifying a man who would go to their aid should natural disaster strike their country. Hugo Chavez, another Castro in the making whatever Carter says, is as delusional as his mentor. The entire scene at the Summit was chaos. It is clear that the authorities had no control whatsoever of the streets. Their sole purpose today-- seemingly --was to keep the protestors away from the dignitaries.

It was Anarchy in the streets. Protestors, Rioters, throwing rocks, smashing windows in downtown department stores, looting, and revelry of the basest sort.

What does it say about a society that has so little control over its populous? What does it say about our own society when the Media Machine can't be honest enough to tell it like it is without injecting its own ideological preferences. What does it say about America when our own government is split down the middle, each side at each others throats? The rift in our own society is a product of the rift in Washington, and the Media is directly responsible. Like Jerry Springer, who deliberately pits two or more dysfunctional parties against each other on a national stage, the media misconstrues, prevaricates, and flatly omits the truth, waiting for the kicking, screaming, and hair-pulling that's sure to come. It's disgraceful.

Dan Rather can warn university students in Maine about the "New Media" and it's "Agenda Driven" purveyors, but he can't see his own Agenda, or that of his ilk. I'm tempted to call it hypocrisy, but the more shite I hear spilling from his and the rest of Main Stream Media's lips, the more pity I feel for how completely self-righteous and delusional they've become.

And in the "mean" time, America suffers all the more for it.

4 Comments:

  1. Anonymous said...
    EL, you need to do research on these subjects before you go spouting off on the web. Bush is in argentina with several other South American political leaders. Hugo Chavez, from Venezuela, filled a stadium with about 25,000 supporters to protest Pres. Bush. Chavez doesn't like the Pres. Bush's proposals about reagarding free trade in South America. These are the basics of the story.

    The reason Bob Schieffer referred to the protesters as "...leftist inspired..." is because very few Americans know anything about Movimiento Revolucionario Bolivariano (MVR) which is the actual name of Chavez's party. Amazingly there are very few Republicans or Democrats in Venezuela.

    When discussing politics the common positioning is that the liberal or radical factions are called "left wing", while conservative or reactionary factions are called "right wing." Chavez's party is interested in social and political reform IN VENEZUELA.

    Your post is what you get when you try to apply American perspectives/politics to other countries.
    Anonymous said...
    Hmmmm. Where to start?

    First, you obviously didn't pay much attention to Schieffer's opening tease, or the story that followed. To condense it... the crowd, "leftist inspired" was in AGENTINA. Chavez [from VENEZUELA] is very popular there [in ARGENTINA]. Hence, "Leftist Inspired."

    "...apply American perspectives/politics to other countries" ?!?

    You're going to chastise me for doing what every news organization in the world does when reporting about "other" countries?

    Furthermore. I know the difference between Argentina and Venezuela. I did a lot of reading before posting my Opinion. ALL of the pictures I've posted were taken in Argentina, at the riots...

    "Some call it a demonstration, I call it a riot, mm hmmm."
    Anonymous said...
    I don't see hypocricy in the story. Just because someone is against the war doesn't make them a leftist. Is Pat Buchanan a leftist?

    The demonstrators/rioters/whatever in Argentina can be accurately characterized as, by and large, leftists. Your photos support that- "contra el capital" and pictures of Che. If such slogans were to appear en masse in a protest here, the MSM would certainly pounce on the story. They are profit-driven and they go for whatever sells.

    The real story here is how Bush's policies have- rightly or wrongly- sparked reactions across the globe that are having serious consequences for all U.S. policy objectives, including purely economic ones. We are beginning to look like a reckless empire, and that perception, whether you believe it is justified or not, is a real strategic problem for the U.S. Thanks, George.

    By the way, I hope you're watching the series on the Crusades on the History channel. It's very good.
    Anonymous said...
    You're right, of course, and thanks for pointing it out. I do support Bush, but it seems I spend much of my time defending "unfair" attacks and end up glossing over or ignoring altogether the perception America enjoys around the world.

Post a Comment