Channel: Home | About

Saudi Arabian Marriage Officiant Said Marriage To One-Year-Old Girl Is Legal

That's right, it is now legal in Saudi Arabia and, realistically, throughout the Muslim world, to marry a girl when she is only one-year old.

Marriage is actually two things: First we are talking about the marriage contract itself. This is one thing, while consummating the marriage-– having sex with the wife for the first time -–is another thing.

There is no minimal age for entering marriage. You can have a marriage contract even with a 1-year-old girl, not to mention a girl of 9, 7, or 8. This is merely a contract [indicating] consent. The guardian in such a case must be the father, because the father's opinion is obligatory. Thus, the girl becomes a wife.

The Prophet Muhammad is the model we follow. He took 'Aisha to be his wife when she was 6, but he had sex with her only when she was 9.


--Ahmad Al-Mu'bi, officiant for marriages from Saudi Arabia


WOW! Marry your neighbor's one-year old daughter, and in eight short years you can have sex with her!? In America you can also have sex with a nine-year old, and thanks to five intellectually deficient inJustices you won't even have to pay the ultimate price for it. But don't do it in Louisiana. Governor Jindal will have you chemically castrated.

Makes me wonder about Liberals when they can so casually condone, by virtue of not punishing, pedophiles. Really makes me wonder.


9 Comments:

  1. Erudite Redneck said...
    I'm against capital punishment in all instances. Period. People who are against capital punishment are against capital punishment in all instances. Period.

    So, go ahead and enjoy your hysterics over pedophilia. But it's just that: hysterics.

    If capital punishment is wrong, it's always wrong.

    And it's wrong.
    Anonymous said...
    ER, Why can you not feel as strongly about what God says is wrong as you do about civil issues? Coming from a former Democrat, I now see that there is nothing worse than bull headed Democrats. Mom2
    Marshal Art said...
    Capital punishment is NOT wrong. But it is wrong in certain circumstances. This is true of any from of punishment and is the basic idea behing the notion of "cruel and unusual". The punishment must fit the crime. Thirty years for blowing a stop sign or a joint would be far beyond what is fitting for such offenses. Forfeiting one's life for taking the life of another is perfectly fitting, as well as Biblically sound.

    And this crap about hysterics is well over the top, whereas Eric's concerns are not. The case being considered involved a grown man raping a child and the damage to her physically is only a part of the damage done to here that she will never forget. I have no problem with this monster being put to death for his crime against God and this girl. My only problem is that CP has always been applied when a murder has occurred and it sets a precedent for application regarding any crime where loss of life isn't involved. This is troubling. At the same time, it does mean that one will only be punished so badly for such a heinous act. That doesn't seem right at all.
    Erudite Redneck said...
    Mom2, all I hear is what EL says, and what MA says, and what the likes of Ms. Green say the Bible says. What I hear Jesus saying is quite different: Love. Welcome all who would come to God. Don't kill. Help others. Very simple. Very different from what EL, and MA, and Ms. Green say!

    I think their selfish concepts of "God" and the church and what it ought to be are in their feeble minds at best; from the smoking stench of hell itself at worst.
    Erudite Redneck said...
    Re, "I have no problem with this monster being put to death for his crime against God and this girl."

    Then you do not have the compassion of Christ, MA. ... I don't either sometimes, I admit. But don't go 1., thinking God needs your puny self to execute his justice, or, 2., that your sense of outrage and graceless revenge are God's. They're not; they're yours and yours alone.
    Marshal Art said...
    Yet, ER, there is sufficient Biblical justification for government meeting out such punishments, and much to your chagrin, God only has us to implement Biblical teaching. Try to find a way to deal with that.

    True compassion would have been that which was given by those who knew the brute personally. As a member of society not in such contact with the jerk, it is well within my rights, if not my duty, to expect that government deal with the perpetrators of such crimes so as to protect others from their evil acts.

    And speaking of the compassion of Christ, do you think His compassion will match your imaginings come Judgement? If all one does is simply deny God, do you see that as a greater crime than brutally raping a small child? I think Christ's compassion will manifest in His perfect judgement, that is, some will enter Heaven, and other eternal damnation, whatever that might entail.

    We have laws. We are required, by society as well as by God, to adhere to those laws. There are also consequences for breaking those laws. Justice demands that those consequences are doled out as the law requires. It's too bad that you do not agree with this. I truly hope and pray that you never have a loved one who falls prey to such a pervert, for I think it's fair to say that your tune would change drastically.

    I'm not playing God, but I do think I'm doing God's will by being as good a citizen as I can. I will support any law that I believe will protect the innocent, particularly children. Capital punishment is a deterrent punishment. All those who have been subjected to it have been permanently deterred from further criminal activity. This creep has no chance of raping another little girl if he's dead.
    Marshal Art said...
    That should be "mete" out justice or punishment, not "meeting". Dang typos.
    Anonymous said...
    Statistically and factually most instances of child sexual abuse are performed by someone the child knows. It can be terrible difficult to get children to implicate these family friends and relations. That is why several child abuse prevention organizations wrote briefs in opposition to Louisiana's law. And of course there is the question of instituting the death penalty for crimes in which there is no death. I can only see that as the start to an awful slippery slope.
    Marshal Art said...
    "And of course there is the question of instituting the death penalty for crimes in which there is no death. I can only see that as the start to an awful slippery slope."

    The very point I was making.

Post a Comment