Channel: Home | About

I'm remembering a film I saw but once. Robert Downey Jr. and Sam Neill in the 1995 film Restoration. Young Merivel, a promising medical student is suddenly swept into favor at the king's court, and enjoys and becomes accustomed to the king's dainties. The king, seeing how Mericel's elevation has changed him, thrusts him out, forcing him to fend for himself. To find himself. I know that sounds trite... to find one's self, but that is where the Republican party, if it is smart, will find itself; on the outside reexamining what made it the answer to Democratic slavery. It must find itself. If ever the Party hopes to see its own restoration, it must find itself. And it must look back to what made it brilliantly promising, not forward.

The Republican party has become indistinguishable from the Democratic Party in terms of Spending and governmental bloat. Naturally, 9/11 didn't help, but the Republican party needs to think on those things that made it the party of Freedom. Because right now it looks remarkably like a Jack Murtha democrat. The Republican party has forsaken principle for a seat at the Democratic table. It needs to push the chair back and step away from the table. It needs to roll up its sleeves and make some very hard decisions. It has to choose whether or not it wants to call itself "Republican," and represent those people who identify themselves as holding traditional Republican values. Or does it want to be what Democrats across this nation have mockingly called it... Neo-Con. If that's what the Republican wants to be... and faithfully morph into a label crafted by the opposition, the party can forget about any further support from its constituents.

The Republican party has not listened, and is not now listening to the people it represents... we don't want the party to lie back and let Democrats lie about the issues. We want the Republican party to take off the apron, step out of the kitchen, and step into the arena. We want to see bloodied knuckles and blackened eyes; not for the sake of sport but for truth's sake. We want to see the Republican party defend itself, its time-honored principles, the truth (even if it hurts), the people it represents, Godly values, the Constitution, and the sovereignty and safety of this nation and ALL its people. What we absolutely will not tolerate is a party that refuses to fight for what it believes. And while, morally speaking, it is much better to stand above the tactics of the enemy, there is nothing wrong with using the enemy's tactics against him.

If I could recommend one book to the Republican party... one piece of mandatory study, it would be Miyamoto Musashi's Book of Five Rings, the classic guide to strategy.

There is timing in everything. Timing in strategy cannot be mastered without a great deal of practice.

"Timing is important in dancing and pipe or string music, for they are in rhythm only if timing is good. Timing and rhythm are also involved in the military arts, shooting bows and guns, and riding horses. In all skills and abilities there is timing.

"There is also timing in the Void.

"There is timing in the whole life of the warrior, in his thriving and declining, in his harmony and discord. Similarly, there is timing in the Way of the merchant, in the rise and fall of capital. All things entail rising and falling timing. You must be able to discern this. In strategy there are various timing considerations. From the outset you must know the applicable timing and the inapplicable timing, and from among the large and small things and the fast and slow timings find the relevant timing, first seeing the distance timing and the background timing. This is the main thing in strategy. It is especially important to know the background timing, otherwise your strategy will become uncertain.

"You win in battles with the timing in the Void born of the timing of cunning by knowing the enemies' timing, and this using a timing which the enemy does not expect.

"All the five books are chiefly concerned with timing. You must train sufficiently to appreciate all this.

"If you practice day and night in the above Ichi school strategy, your spirit will naturally broaden. Thus is large scale strategy and the strategy of hand to hand combat propagated in the world. This is recorded for the first time in the five books of Ground, Water, Fire, Tradition (Wind), and Void. This is the Way for men who want to learn my strategy:

  • Do not think dishonestly.
  • The Way is in training.
  • Become acquainted with every art.
  • Know the Ways of all professions.
  • Distinguish between gain and loss in worldly matters.
  • Develop intuitive judgment and understanding for everything.
  • Perceive those things which cannot be seen.
  • Pay attention even to trifles.
  • Do nothing which is of no use.

"It is important to start by setting these broad principles in your heart, and train in the Way of strategy. If you do not look at things on a large scale it will be difficult for you to master strategy. If you learn and attain this strategy you will never lose even to twenty or thirty enemies. More than anything to start with you must set your heart on strategy and earnestly stick to the Way. You will come to be able to actually beat men in fights, and to be able to win with your eye. Also by training you will be able to freely control your own body, conquer men with your body, and with sufficient training you will be able to beat ten men with your spirit. When you have reached this point, will it not mean that you are invincible?

"Moreover, in large scale strategy the superior man will manage many subordinates dexterously, bear himself correctly, govern the country and foster the people, thus preserving the ruler's discipline. If there is a Way involving the spirit of not being defeated, to help oneself and gain honor, it is the Way of strategy."

The Republican Party needs to step up to the plate and decide what it wants to be, and the sooner the better. Barack Obama has two years to show this nation he is a capable leader; in two years the campaigning will begin again in earnest. And if Obama can't pull our collective ----- out of the fire, he may very well go the way of Jimmy Carter.

And knowing what I already know about the man, that would be fine with this Republican.


11 Comments:

  1. Dan Trabue said...
    If I could recommend one book to the Republican party... one piece of mandatory study, it would be Miyamoto Musashi's Book of Five Rings...

    Or, you might try Alinsky's book or other Community Organizing treatises (I recommend Robert Linthicum's book, Doing Justice). You don't have to like Obama to recognize that community organizing has some very smart ideas that help achieve one's goals in a democratic, grass-roots kind of way.
    Eric said...
    "Or you might try Alinsky's book..."

    LOL! You can't be serious! Musashi is superior to Alinsky for a number of reasons, not least among them being his honesty.
    Dan Trabue said...
    Oh? You've read Alinsky? Where is he dishonest? Specifically.

    I have no opinion on Musashi, as I have not read his book and don't generally form opinions about books I have not read, or from people I have not read.

    As I said, you don't have to like Obama to recognize how grandly and effectively his organization was run. I'm just saying, you may want to learn from a winner.

    As Musashi himself says, "Know the Ways of all professions." I'd reckon that includes the Community Organizer.

    But hey, you can read whomever you want. The Republicans can keep making the same mistakes, it's no skin off my nose.
    Marshal Art said...
    Strangely and uncharacteristicly, Dan has a point. "Know thy enemies" is a strategy that has great value. Recall Patton and George C. Scott yelling in the African desert to Rommel, "I read your book, you son-of-a-bitch!". I wouldn't be surprised to know some enterprising Republican reading Alinsky right now for that very purpose, to better understand the opposition.

    As for ourselves, knowing Alinsky's tactics in order to thwart them as they are recognized is sufficient. Jesus only used truth to organize. Indeed, there is truth in the core values of conservatism that appeal to more people than do liberal ideas, but they must be presented better. The logic of them is inescapable.
    Erudite Redneck said...
    Too late. The GOP is a corpse that doesn't know it's dead. ... For now. ... And whatever comes back, neither of us wiol recognize as the "Republican Party." LOL
    Eric said...
    "Know thy enemy" is embodied in "Know the ways of all professions".

    ER, you're right. But thankfully it is the NEO-Republican party that is a rotting corpse. If what remains will but look back and shed it's "DNC chrysalis" it stands a chance at resurrection.
    Dan Trabue said...
    Sooo, that's a "NO, I have not read Alinksy"? You can't name any specific dishonesty he has perpetrated because you are wholly unaware of what he has actually written and said?

    What if, Eric, you have been deluded and are mistaken about Alinsky? What if whoever your sources are were wrong and that he has not been dishonest? Would that mean that you have been spreading rumors and falsehoods about a man whom you do not know and who has never done anything to harm you? And would that mean that you are failing to follow your Christ's teachings?
    Eric said...
    Dude! He dedicated his Rules for Radicals to Lucifer-- the epitome of dishonesty! Does that not give you reason to question the man's integrity? Does it not give you the slightest pause?

    Alinsky may have written a book filled with successful guides to achieving "radical change," but at what cost? A book dedicated to Lucifer, is not a book I can take seriously.

    Perhaps YOUR Christ sees nothing wrong in that, but I distinctly remember MY Lord had a lot to say about the children/disciples of Lucifer in the 8th chapter of John's gospel.

    "You are of your father the devil!"

    Rules for Radicals? Yeah, that's a book I want to read and take to heart. [snark!]
    Dan Trabue said...
    Sooo, no, you have not read it? And as far as you know, you may well be repeating lies and slander about a man whom you know very little (except, apparently, the introduction of his book...)? I wonder, do you know if it was written tongue-in-cheek or because he is a serious follower of Lucifer? Why do you suppose he would do such a thing?

    My point, Eric, is that it is rarely a fair thing to crucify a man based on your hunches about what he has said or based on what other people have said about him. Too often, the others you are relying upon have an agenda and you find out, too late, that you have crucified an innocent man.

    Ask our Lord about that one.
    Dan Trabue said...
    And before you misinterpret me, NO, I am not comparing Alinsky to Christ. I'm suggesting that it is wrong to slander people and castigate them for what they have said when you don't even know what they have said.
    Dan Trabue said...
    After all, that IS one of the charges against Jesus - that he operated on behalf of Beelzebub. The pharisees, too, thought that Jesus' words were quite clear and that he MUST be doing things because he was a servant of Beelzebub.

    Turns out they were wrong, too. They hadn't really listened to what he had actually said, either.

Post a Comment