New evidence of Noah’s Flood from Mexico
Dinosaur dig reveals dramatic insights into the degree of devastation, not so long ago...

"Researchers tried to reconstruct the sort of environment that could explain the remarkable evidence they were finding in the area, but by ignoring Noah’s Flood they were hard pressed to make a plausible story. It was clear that the sediments pointed to a large watery catastrophe involving mass deaths but they were straining to find a modern analogy."



Read the entire article here

------------

More than a few problems exist in the findings of 'accepted' science, and not just in the field of archaeology. Accepted Science tries to force its findings upon its preconceived notions; namely, that there's no room for God and the events of the Bible in its rational world of science-- God, to the adherents of accepted science, is irrational. It is not irrational, however, to ask from where do all our legends of dragons and such come, and draw a conclusion that perhaps, just perhaps, dinosaurs and man lived concurrently... and not aeons apart.

Who would be hurt by such a conclusion?

Perhaps the same people-- albeit in different robes; a different kind of people --who forced Galileo to recant of face excommunication. The unsaved world can't afford to accept that any element of Biblical history (especially The Flood) might just be true. To do so would force them to reevaluate the entire foundation of their science.